Logo RPF general

 

 

 

HOUSEHOLD OBJECTS (1973)


THE Floyd's major project. In any case, the one to which the band was most attached for the longest, and the one most fantasised about by fans. Paradoxically, on the heels of the titanic success of « The Dark Side of the Moon », the band found itself on the back foot!  For the first time, the band's members do not have enough material to produce a successor to their flagship album. Whereas in their tender years, the Floyd were constantly developing new material, notably through their live performances, the band has devoted itself entirely (for the last two years at least) to « The Dark Side of the Moon » 






Nick Mason

«We haven't made a new record because Dark Side is still selling a lot, so EMI isn't pressing for a new product. Finally we have worked with care, stopping ourselves on some things and excluding some pieces, which we would record if we were under pressure»

Ciao 2001, 25 May 1975


No longer able to support their old repertoire and, consequently, the unreleased tracks developed at the time, the musicians found themselves in the studio without any joint project. The project was led by Waters, who had always been interested in using sounds other than rock.

John Leckie (sound engineer) :

«They spent days working on what people now call Household Objects. They were making chords up from the tapping of beer bottles, tearing newspapers to get a rhythm, and letting off aerosol cans to get a hi-hat sound»

« The Lost Pink Floyd Album », Classic Rock Magazine, Mark Blake, October 2013


Roger Waters:

« I’ve always felt that the differentiation between a sound effect and music is all a load of shit. Whether you make a sound on a guitar or a water tap is irrelevant »

«Speak to Me», ZigZagMagazine#32, 1973.


Nick Mason:

« (...)« The Household Objects» album would have been the wittiest thing to do next, and it would have been if we could have knocked it out. But I think what we'll do is what we've always done in the past, which is to struggle away at whatever we've got and see how it comes out».

«A Pre-Season report on Pink Floyd», Sounds, August 17th 1974.


Alan Parson:

« We made the bass loop, then i dubbed on the brush, then each individual beat of the snare had to be dubbed in after that, and then another loop was made on the 24-track. SO it went, click track on the 24-track, then the brush, then a couple beats of the snare individually keyed-in, then a bass drum which was just footsteps on the floor using a lot of EQ »

«Interview w/. Alan Parson», Recording Engineer/Producer, October 1976.


David Gilmour:

«We actually did get something out of it that we used on «Wish You Were Here». We did actually use some of the «Household Objects»- the wine glasses were in some of the music at the beginning of the «Wish You Were Here» album »

«90 Years of EMI Radio Special », hosted by Klef Richard, November 26th 1988.


Nick Mason:

« Almost everything we’ve ever recorded in a studio has been extracted by someone at some point and subsequently bootlegged. However, no such recordings exist of the «Household Objects» tapes for the simple reason that we never managed to produce any actual music. All the time we devoted to the project was spent exploring the non-musical sounds, and the most we ever achieved was a small number of tentative rhythm tracks »

«Inside Out: A Personal History of Pink Floyd», Nick Mason, 2005.


Rick Wright:

« I think it was Roger who said, «let’s make an album without using any of our instruments, but (using) household objects. So we’d spend days getting a pencil and a rubber band till it sounded like a bass… spend weeks and weeks doing this. Nick would find old sauce pans and stuff, and then deaden them to try and make them sound exactly like a snare drum. I remember sitting down with Roger and saying, «Roger, this is insane!» ».

«Which One’s Pink ?», BBC TV, 2007.


Nick Mason: 

«There are things like sixteen tracks of glasses tuned to a scale across the 16-track: it can be played across the faders, but what it really needs is each one going through a VCS3 or something, and then coming in to a keyboard. I suppose really it's a very, very, very, very crude Mellotron. There's a whole load of things we've done --some of them just down as sounds that work, others as bass lines, tunes. The Household Objects album would have been the wittiest thing to do next, and it would have been if we could have knocked it out. But I think what we'll do is what we've always done in the past, which is to struggle away at whatever we've got and see how it comes out»

Sounds, 17 August 1974

So what were the recording dates for this project and what did the band actually record?

As we shall see, the band worked on this idea over three years. The first phase took place in 1971, building on the experiments of 1969 ("The Man & The Journey") and 1970 (Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast). Although the band worked on recording new material during 1971, this does not mean that they worked exclusively on this project. There were three main 'waves' of recording for « The Household Objects »:


Nick Mason: « Ideally we'd like to spend February sorting out the ideas, and March doing the album — and April and May if necessary. So far we've got down about 14 different ideas for the album, including one for a piece involving acoustic objcts."

Interviewer: « What sort of acoustic objects ? »

Nick Mason: « Bottles, felling axes, saws — that sort of thing»

« Floyd’s breathing space », Sounds, 23 January 1971


Dominique Blanc-Francard (ingénieur du son):

« Il restait trois jours après que le film était fini et ils m'ont demandé de faire des expériences avec eux. Pour moi, c'était une vraie expérience musicale. C'est le groupe le plus avant gardiste que je connaissais. Il était très, très, très, très, très avant gardiste dans leur façon de travailler, dans la connaissance de la musique.  Ce qu'on a fait, c'était probablement avant le sampler, cet appareil qui permet d’échantillonner des sons, de les jouer. Il voulait faire une boîte à rythme, mais avec des sons réels. Roger Waters avait pris une planche. Il a mis deux clous et un élastique, comme un moteur d'avion à hélice, puis tirait sur l’élastique. Moi, j'avais mis un micro tout près. Il entendait un son énorme de contrebasse avec un son qui n'était pas du tout un sans contrebasse.  On a fait une grosse caisse avec une planche sur laquelle il tapait avec une basket et la caisse claire. C'était une bombe aérosol qu'on utilisait pour enlever les contacts, pour enlever les crachats sur des contacts et potentiomètres. Pas évidemment pas sur le micro, mais à côté. Et donc une fois qu'on avait ça, ils ont dit: « maintenant, on va essayer de faire un rythme avec ça ».  Donc, on a fait une boucle avec la basket qui tapait sur la grosse caisse, une boucle de bande avec le petit son. On avait calculé la longueur de boucle pour que ça fasse poum, poum poum. L'artisanal complètement, mais ensuite enregistré sur le multi-pistes. Mais après, par contre, nous n’avons pas réussi à synchroniser le reste. 

Et ils m'ont dit «Dominique, c'est génial. Mais nous, je crois qu'il y a aucun studio au monde actuellement qui est assez performant pour ce qu'on a dans la tête». Et là, j'ai compris qu'il avait déjà inventé un truc qu'on ne connaissait pas, c'est l'échantillonnage»

«Les nocturnes avec Dominique Blanc-Francard», RTL Radio, 22 June 2016.


But it was really after the recording of « The Dark Side of The Moon » that the Floyd began to work seriously on « Household Objects » (certainly confirming their desire to make it the successor to their masterpiece).

Nick Sedgewick: « I remember I went to E.M.I. studios in the winter of ‘73, and the band were recording stuff with bottles and rubber bands… the period I’m talking about is the before your French tour in June ‘74 »

Roger Waters: «Ah! Right, yeah. Answer starts here… (great intake of breath)... Well, Nick … there was an abortive attempt to make an album not using any musical instruments. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but it didn’t come together. Probably because we needed to stop for a bit ».

Nick Sedgewick: «Why ?»

Roger Waters:« Oh, just tired and bored …»

«A Rambling Conversation with Roger Waters Concerning All This and That», Wish you were here Songbook, 1975.


Contrary to what some might think, this was a serious project with a real desire to release an album radically different from « The Dark Side … », still produced by Alan Parson!

David Gilmour: 

«Strategically, our best thing to do next would be something weird, far out that nobody could possibly understand» 

«Adventures of an insular gang», Sounds, 17 August 1974


Nick Mason:

« (…) we haven't made a new record because « Dark Side » is still selling a lot, so EMI isn't pressing for a new product. Finally we have worked with care, stopping ourselves on some things and excluding some pieces, which we would record if we were under pressure ».

«Article on Pink Floyd», Ciao 2001, May 25th 1975.


Alan Parson:

« I figure it was a great shame that they didn't go on with to because it had the makings of becoming a tremendous album. At the time we were doing it, four or five months after Dark Side, it was literally all experimentation»

«Interview w/. Alan Parson», Recording Engineer/Producer, October 1976.


What was recorded? Alan Parson and Nick Mason spoke very early on about the content of the project:

Nick Mason:

«There are things like sixteen tracks of glasses tuned to a scale across the 16-track: it can be played across the faders, but what it really needs is each one going through a VCS3 or something, and then coming in to a keyboard. I suppose really it's a very, very, very, very crude Mellotron. There's a whole load of things we've done --some of them just down as sounds that work, others as bass lines, tunes».

«A Pre-Season report on Pink Floyd», Sounds, 17 August 1974.


Alan Parson:« I figure it was a great shame that they didn't go on with to because it had the makings of becoming a tremendous album. At the time we were doing it, four or five months after Dark Side, it was literally all experimentation. While we were recording the rubber band, for example, we were encountering some problems in that, when you record it, you're dealing with a fixed-pitch. We discovered, almost by accident, thefts way of getting the rubber band right was to sort of prop it uo on matchsticks on a table. Then we found it you put your finger in-between, it would change pitch, of course. And then you found you got an even better sound by sticking matchsticks in the middle, which was the re-discovery of the fret. The mic was literally about 1/8 inch away from the rubber band. The rubber band was about a foot long to get a low note. Eventually, we ended up with a riff that had been played, with this rubber band, made a tape-loop of that, and dubbed on a sweeping-up brush banged on a floor as a high hat. Amazing hi hat sound. Really quite authentic (...) The snare drum was done with aerosol spray, shhh-shhh-shhh, but you couldn't get it short enough by pressing it, si i had to record a long spray and then cut it to 1/2 inch lengths of tape between white leader into a loop to sh-sh-sh. It was a really good snare drum sound »

Interviewer:« What else was used ? »

Alan Parson:« Blowing into bottles (...) It's sort of like an organ if you have lots of them and use VSO. We also had electric razor and egg slicer, using the wires for plucking »

Interviewer:« Did any of these recordings turn into a song ? »

Alan Parson:« They kind of tries, but there were never vocals of it. Oh, another thing was footsteps. We overdubbed footsteps to simulate footsteps. Rick was holding the mic by his feet while we walked around the studio. Each group member tried it, and it turned out that Rick had the most suitable shoes. But it really is a shame that album didn't surface. It could have been really something »

Interviewer:« How much came out of the sessions ? »

Alan Parson:« Well, that's the thing. We ended with virtually zero. And it's a shame because there was a lot of time spent on it, but to do that, some of it became very tedious. We probably spent in excess of a week doing it, and the majority of that was spent going. Later the Floyd wanted me to set up their studio and continue to go on the road. I had done three American tours with them ans it was they that brought me to America »

Interviewer:« How much material did you end up with ? »

Alan Parson:« Very little. A lot of it was also compelling tapes of wine glasses vary-speeded at different pitches so you could make up different chords by combining different tracks on the 24-track (...) It was a matter of scraping your finger on the edge and then vary-speeding it from a loop. In order to make the edit not jump in a loop, you have to make a very long cut. The splice would have to be about 2 1/2 inches »

«Interview w/. Alan Parson», Recording Engineer/Producer, October 1976.


Even if it seems difficult for the band to detail what was recorded, given the nature of the tracks. Reading the session-sheets gives some indication:


David Gilmour

«I don't think it will be for this album now. We got a lot of stuff down — enough for a whole side I think — but we've had some disagreement over it and I think the general opinion seems to be that it is not quite right for this LP.We got some jolly good sounds though, and it would be fun to show people what with a little thought they could get out of things they've got lying around the house»

«Floyd’s search for fresh matrial», Sounds, 1st May 1971

À la lecture de ces indications et du temps de travail, on peut donc envisager la présence des morceaux suivants: